NURS205 Communications, Information Communication Technology, Psychology, Sociology & Ethics Continuous Assessment 1, 2026 | Hibernia College

University	Hibernia College (HC)
Subject	NURS205 Communications Information Communication Technology Psychology Sociology & Ethics

NURS205 CA1 Academic Essay

Essay Title: The opportunities and challenges presented by technology for person-centred care.

This assessment supports you to achieve the following module learning outcomes:

Integrate and summarise the supportive role of information communication technology to current nursing practice

Aim

The aim of this assignment is to enable the student to explore the impact of technology on professional nursing practice and patient care

Assignment Guidelines

The increasing use of technology in the healthcare environment brings both opportunities and challenges for person-centred care. Discuss this statement with reference to the literature.

Introduction

The introduction to this assignment should discuss the relevance of the topic to nursing practice. The opportunities and challenges for person-centred care should be clearly identified.

Body of Evidence Based Discussion

Using the research to support, discuss in detail the opportunities and challenges to personcentred care arising from the increasing use of technology in the Irish healthcare system.

Conclusion

Summarise your findings and concluding remarks, including recommendations for practice in your role as a student nurse.

Presentation Guidelines 

Word count

1,500 words, +/− 10% (excluding references)

Reference List

Utilise and reference appropriate research in the assignment and compile a reference list using the HC Harvard Referencing system.

NURS205 CA1Marking Criteria

Mark/level	Knowledge	Comprehension	Analysis	Synthesis	Evaluation	Language	Referencing
90%+ Outstanding	Outstandingly good use of literature from a wide range of disciplines relevant to the area	Exceptional good use of solving complex problems with sound conclusion	Outstandingly welldeveloped, logical argument; clear structure and presentation	Exceptional level of creative, independent, imaginative thinking; develops new ways of viewing things	Exceptionally high level of critical evaluation; identifies all implications of research critique	Outstanding use of Standard English with proposition of new hypotheses; no grammatical or spelling errors	No referencing errors; excellent reference list; Hibernia College Harvard style used; originality in the use of quotations
80–89% Excellent	Excellent use of literature from a wide range of disciplines; mainly primary sources	Excellent use of explanation; specialised vocabulary with sound conclusion	Excellent development with logical argument; clear structure and presentation	Excellent level of independent and creative thinking; frequent generation of new ways of viewing issues	Excellent level of critical review; highly articulate reviews of major and minor relevant issues	Excellent use of Standard English with proposition of new hypotheses; no grammatical or spelling errors	Excellent reference list; no referencing errors; Hibernia College Harvard style used; creative use of quotations
70–79% Very good	Very good use of literature from a range of disciplines relevant to the area; a small number of secondary sources	Very good use of explanation and conclusion; question answered fully	Very well developed with logical argument; clear structure and presentation	Very good level of independent and creative thinking; frequent generation of new ways of viewing issues; makes good links between areas	Very good critical thinking demonstrated; evaluates major and minor issues of relevance	Very good use of Standard English with distinct personal style; no grammatical or spelling errors	No referencing errors; very good list of references; Hibernia College Harvard style used; creative use of quotations
60–69% Good	Evidence of highly relevant knowledge and principles; use of relevant, up-to-date research	Good use of explanation and conclusion; may omit one or two minor issues	Clearly developed logical argument; good structure and presentation	Good level of independent and creative thinking; a number of new ways of viewing issues; makes relevant links	Strengths and weaknesses of material identified; reviews major and minor issues	Good use of Standard English; no grammatical or spelling errors	Good list of references; Hibernia College Harvard style used; appropriate use of quotations; minor referencing errors
50–59% Fair	Evidence of relevant knowledge and principles; uses relevant but not always up-to-date research	Fairly good use of explanation and conclusion; partially answered the question	Adequately developed argument; fairly clear structure and presentation	Adequate level of independent thinking; a number of new ways of viewing issues; demonstrates some links	Identifies major and some minor issues; evaluates major strengths and weaknesses	Acceptable use of Standard English; no or few grammatical or spelling errors	A few missing or inaccurate references; adequate reference list; Hibernia College Harvard style used; too many direct quotations used
40–49% Pass – acceptable	Mainly descriptive use of knowledge; little research used; mostly secondary sources	Adequate explanation and conclusion; some aspects of the question answered	Structure not entirely clear; thinking occasionally confused	Minimal level of independent thinking; infrequent new ways of viewing issues; few links demonstrated	Most major issues identified; limited critical appraisal of major strengths and weaknesses	Adequate use of Standard English; meaning clear; some grammatical and/or spelling errors	Several missing or inaccurate references; short reference list; Hibernia College Harvard style used; excessive use of quotations
35–39% Fail/possible compensation*	Inadequate or outdated knowledge; some research cited but much not recent or relevant	Poor explanation and conclusion; answer omitted some essential issues	Weak structure and some confusion in presenting the argument	No real evidence of independent thinking; does not generate new ways of viewing issues; very few links	Mainly descriptive with little critical appraisal; few issues identified	Inadequate use of Standard English but, generally, can be understood; some grammatical and spelling errors	Many referencing errors; inadequate reference list; wrong style used; too many quotations
0–34% Fail	Inaccurate, outdated and virtually no relevant knowledge; minimal research	Inadequate explanation and conclusion; few or virtually no relevant points	Virtually no structure and significant confusion in the argument	No real evidence of independent thinking; no new ways of viewing issues; virtually no links demonstrated	Appraisal not present; no major issues identified	Poor use of Standard English; meaning unclear; several grammatical and spelling errors	Many referencing errors and inappropriate list of references; incorrect referencing style used

Do You Need Cutom-Written Answer For NURS205 Continuous Assessment 1

Get A Free Quote

Get Help By Expert

If you are struggling with your NURS205 academic essay (Hibernia College), especially in critically discussing technology in person-centred care, using evidence-based research, or meeting Harvard referencing standards, you are not alone. Many nursing students find it difficult to balance theory, analysis, and practical recommendations. That’s why you can choose ireland Assignments for expert nursing assignment help tailored to your academic requirements. You can also explore our pay someone to do my essay service or review Hibernia College assignment samples for guidance. Get 100% human-written, plagiarism-free solutions designed for better grades.