NURS201 Development of Professional Nursing Continuous Assessment 2 Brief 2026

University	Hibernia College (HC)
Subject	NURS201 Development of Professional Nursing

NURS201 Continuous Assessment 2 Brief

Care Plan for Simulated Surgical Patient

Do not include any patient or organizational identifying data in any part of this assignment.

This assessment supports you to achieve the following module learning outcome:

Classify nursing care needs of patients using nursing diagnosis terminology
Construct nursing care plans for patients with surgical care needs utilising nursing diagnosis and nursing interventions
Explore and summarise the role of the nurse in the interventional care environment

Instructions to Students

Aim of Assignment

The aim of this assignment is to facilitate the student to prioritise and create care plans based on a fictitious simulated patient. The student will be expected to critically analyse current evidence-based practice that supports the nursing care of actual and potential problems that may be experienced by the surgical patient.

Scenario for Care Plan

The following ISBAR₃ is used to handover the clinical care of Ben Smith from the recovery nurse to the ward nurse.

Identify	Ben Smith, 81 years of age.
Situation	Bilateral total knee replacements.
Background	Osteoarthritis Hypertension Type 1 Diabetic Very anxious pre-op regarding mobility Previous right total hip replacement 2017
Assessment	Patient is alert and orientated. Dressings to both wound sites are dry and intact, no ooze. INEWS score is 3. His vital signs are as follows: RR is 22 breaths per minute, Oxygen Saturation is 96%, Blood Pressure is 115/75mmHg and HR is 105 BPM. Patient is apyrexial. Pain is 5/10 at present. Analgesia and antibiotics administered intra op.
Recommendation	Regular analgesia as prescribed Antibiotics as prescribed. Mobilise after 24 hours with physio

Presentation Guidelines for Assignment

Introduction

The introduction to the patient care plan should include an overall systematic assessment of the patient Ben Smith. Identify 2 key actual or potential problems that may be experienced by Ben Smith. You must develop 2 care plans to address each of these problems using the nursing process.

Main Body

You must critically discuss the evidence underpinning the nursing care outlined within your care plans. Identify and discuss appropriate nursing assessment tools that you used to support the nursing care of Mr. Murtagh. Reflect on the nursing interventions that you provided as part of your care plan and give a rationale for same. Evaluate the nursing interventions that were given to Mr. Murtagh to help alleviate the 2 chosen problems and describe the outcomes.

Conclusion and recommendations for future care

Draw the assignment to a conclusion and summarise the main points that you addressed in the main body of your assignment. Include a recommendation for practice for future care of a patient with a similar condition.

Word Count

1500 words, +/- 10% (excluding references and the appendices).

Reference List

Utilise and reference appropriate research in the assignment and compile a reference list using the HC Harvard Referencing system.

Appendices

Include your 2 completed care plans as an appendix. Use the ADPIE care plan template in your module book to help you create your care plans. Appendices must be included after the reference list.

NURS201 CA 2 Marking Criteria

Mark/level	Knowledge	Comprehension	Analysis	Synthesis	Evaluation	Language	Referencing
90%+ Outstanding	Outstandingly good use of literature from a wide range of disciplines relevant to the area	Exceptional good use of solving complex problems with sound conclusion	Outstandingly welldeveloped, logical argument; clear structure and presentation	Exceptional level of creative, independent, imaginative thinking; develops new ways of viewing things	Exceptionally high level of critical evaluation; identifies all implications of research critique	Outstanding use of Standard English with proposition of new hypotheses; no grammatical or spelling errors	No referencing errors; excellent reference list; Hibernia College Harvard style used; originality in the use of quotations
80–89% Excellent	Excellent use of literature from a wide range of disciplines; mainly primary sources	Excellent use of explanation; specialised vocabulary with sound conclusion	Excellent development with logical argument; clear structure and presentation	Excellent level of independent and creative thinking; frequent generation of new ways of viewing issues	Excellent level of critical review; highly articulate reviews of major and minor relevant issues	Excellent use of Standard English with proposition of new hypotheses; no grammatical or spelling errors	Excellent reference list; no referencing errors; Hibernia College Harvard style used; creative use of quotations
70–79% Very good	Very good use of literature from a range of disciplines relevant to the area; a small number of secondary sources	Very good use of explanation and conclusion; question answered fully	Very well developed with logical argument; clear structure and presentation	Very good level of independent and creative thinking; frequent generation of new ways of viewing issues; makes good links between areas	Very good critical thinking demonstrated; evaluates major and minor issues of relevance	Very good use of Standard English with distinct personal style; no grammatical or spelling errors	No referencing errors; very good list of references; Hibernia College Harvard style used; creative use of quotations
60–69% Good	Evidence of highly relevant knowledge and principles; use of relevant, up-to-date research	Good use of explanation and conclusion; may omit one or two minor issues	Clearly developed logical argument; good structure and presentation	Good level of independent and creative thinking; a number of new ways of viewing issues; makes relevant links	Strengths and weaknesses of material identified; reviews major and minor issues	Good use of Standard English; no grammatical or spelling errors	Good list of references; Hibernia College Harvard style used; appropriate use of quotations; minor referencing errors
50–59% Fair	Evidence of relevant knowledge and principles; uses relevant but not always up-to-date research	Fairly good use of explanation and conclusion; partially answered the question	Adequately developed argument; fairly clear structure and presentation	Adequate level of independent thinking; a number of new ways of viewing issues; demonstrates some links	Identifies major and some minor issues; evaluates major strengths and weaknesses	Acceptable use of Standard English; no or few grammatical or spelling errors	A few missing or inaccurate references; adequate reference list; Hibernia College Harvard style used; too many direct quotations used
40–49% Pass – acceptable	Mainly descriptive use of knowledge; little research used; mostly secondary sources	Adequate explanation and conclusion; some aspects of the question answered	Structure not entirely clear; thinking occasionally confused	Minimal level of independent thinking; infrequent new ways of viewing issues; few links demonstrated	Most major issues identified; limited critical appraisal of major strengths and weaknesses	Adequate use of Standard English; meaning clear; some grammatical and/or spelling errors	Several missing or inaccurate references; short reference list; Hibernia College Harvard style used; excessive use of quotations
35–39% Fail/possible compensation*	Inadequate or outdated knowledge; some research cited but much not recent or relevant	Poor explanation and conclusion; answer omitted some essential issues	Weak structure and some confusion in presenting the argument	No real evidence of independent thinking; does not generate new ways of viewing issues; very few links	Mainly descriptive with little critical appraisal; few issues identified	Inadequate use of Standard English but, generally, can be understood; some grammatical and spelling errors	Many referencing errors; inadequate reference list; wrong style used; too many quotations
0–34% Fail	Inaccurate, outdated and virtually no relevant knowledge; minimal research	Inadequate explanation and conclusion; few or virtually no relevant points	Virtually no structure and significant confusion in the argument	No real evidence of independent thinking; no new ways of viewing issues; virtually no links demonstrated	Appraisal not present; no major issues identified	Poor use of Standard English; meaning unclear; several grammatical and spelling errors	Many referencing errors and inappropriate list of references; incorrect referencing style used

Last-Minute Help for NURS201 Continuous Assessment 2 Nursing Tasks

Get A Free Quote

Get Help By Expert

Are you also finding the NURS201 Development of Professional Nursing Continuous Assessment 2 difficult to complete? Many nursing students struggle with creating proper ADPIE care plans, identifying nursing diagnoses, and critically discussing evidence-based interventions within the word limit. Sometimes understanding surgical patient care, nursing assessment tools, and Harvard referencing together becomes stressful. But now you do not need to worry because Ireland Assignments provides professional nursing assignment help based on your course requirements. You can also check our hibernia college assignment examples and explore NURS201 continuous assessment 1 for better understanding. Order today our ireland assignment help and get a custom-written, plagiarism-free, and properly structured nursing assignment prepared specially for your academic needs.