PSYC8006 Gender and Sexuality in Social Care Assignment Brief – The Cork Institute of Technology (CIT)
| University | Cork Institute Of Technology (CIT) |
| Subject | PSYC8006 Gender and Sexuality in Social Care |
Chosen Topic:
Sexuality & Spiritual Prepare 1500 words of Written report and 500 words for Presentation on the chosen topic.
Assignment Brief:
Exploring Gender and Sexuality through Research and Presentation Project Overview Your assignment involves conducting a comprehensive exploration of gender and sexuality by combining a systematic review of relevant literature with small-scale primary research.
This project is designed to foster a deeper understanding of the theories of Gender and Sexuality covered in our course.
Research Components
1. Literature Review: Conduct a systematic review of available, reliable, and pertinent literature and resources related to your chosen topic. This will serve as the foundation for your project.
2. Primary Research: Incorporate small-scale primary research into your project, such as a brief survey or a couple of interviews. Craft research questions closely tied to your chosen topic and ensure that data collection and analysis are integral to your presentation.
Presentation Requirements
The in-person presentation should align with the theories of Gender and Sexuality discussed in class. Integrate these theories into the presentation to provide a robust theoretical framework for your findings.
Presentation: 60% of your total grade
Written Report
The written report should not exceed 1500 words and should encompass the following elements:
- A concise description of the chosen topic and the research methodology employed in your project.
- An explicit connection between the topic and the Gender and Sexuality theories covered in the module.
- A comprehensive discussion of the topic based on the research conducted and the insights shared during your presentation. Important Dates Assessment
Written Report: 40% of your total grade
Please ensure that your project not only showcases your research skills but also demonstrates a deep understanding of the theories of Gender and Sexuality explored in class. If you have any questions or require clarification, don’t hesitate to contact your lecturer. Good luck with your assignment!
Are You Searching Answer of this Question? Request Ireland Writers to Write a plagiarism Free Copy for You.
Assessment Rubric for Project and Presentation for Gender and Sexuality Module. PSYC8006
| Criteria | Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Needs
Improvement |
Unsatisfactory | Weight |
| Literature Review | Comprehensive and systematic review of highly relevant, reliable, and current sources. Demonstrates
exceptional understanding and synthesis of theories on gender and sexuality. |
Strong review of mostly relevant and reliable sources. Demonstrates good understanding of gender and sexuality theories. | Adequate review, with some relevant sources. Some connections to gender and sexuality theories are present. | Limited review with minimal relevant sources. Theories are mentioned but lack depth. | Inadequate review, with few or no relevant sources. Theories are missing or poorly integrated. | 20% |
| Primary Research | Excellent integration of small-scale primary research (e.g., interviews, surveys). Research questions are well-crafted and clearly tied to the topic. Data collection and analysis are thorough and insightful. | Good integration of primary research with clear research questions. Data collection and analysis are solid but could be deeper. | Primary research is somewhat connected to the topic. Data collection and analysis are basic. | Minimal integration of primary research with weak research questions. Data collection or analysis lacks rigor. | No primary research conducted or poorly executed. No clear research questions or data analysis. | 20% |
| Application of
Gender and Sexuality Theories |
Exceptional and clear integration of gender and sexuality theories throughout the project and presentation. Demonstrates critical engagement with the theories in relation to the topic.
|
Good integration of relevant theories. Engagement with
the theories is clear but not as critical or deep. |
Some integration of gender and sexuality theories, but the connection is not consistently clear. | Minimal integration of relevant theories, with little critical
engagement or explanation. |
Little to no use of gender and sexuality theories, or the application is incorrect. | 20% |
| Depth of Analysis and Critical Thinking | Demonstrates a deep, critical understanding of the subject matter, offering insightful and original analysis. | Shows good understanding and
critical thinking, though analysis may lack depth in some areas. |
Basic understanding with some critical thought but lacks depth or originality in analysis. | Little critical thinking or depth in analysis. Discussion remains superficial or descriptive. | No evidence of
critical thinking. Analysis is very superficial or missing. |
15% |
| Presentation of Findings | Clear, well-organized, and engaging presentation. Findings are presented logically, with strong visuals and clear links to both the research and theoretical framework. | Presentation is organized and clear, with some effective visuals. Findings are generally wellpresented and linked to the research. | Presentation is somewhat organized, but findings lack clarity or logical flow. Visuals may be underdeveloped. | Poorly organized presentation, with unclear findings and limited use of visuals. Weak connection to research or theories. | Presentation is disorganized, confusing, or incomplete. Findings and visuals are unclear or missing. | 10% |
| Engagement with Audience | Exceptional engagement with the audience, encouraging questions and discussion. Presenter demonstrates confidence and deep knowledge of the subject. | Good engagement with the audience, answering questions with confidence and clarity. | Adequate engagement with the audience, though presenter may lack confidence or clarity in responses. | Minimal audience engagement. Presenter struggles to answer questions or convey knowledge clearly. | Little to no
engagement with the audience. Presenter is unable to answer questions or demonstrate understanding. |
5% |
| Professionalism and Delivery | Presentation is polished, professional, and well-rehearsed. Strong verbal communication, eye contact, and appropriate pacing. | Presentation is mostly professional, with good verbal communication and pacing, though some minor issues may be present. | Adequate presentation with some
professionalism, but notable issues with delivery (e.g., pacing, eye contact). |
Presentation lacks professionalism, with significant issues in delivery, such as poor pacing or weak communication. | Unprofessional presentation with major issues in delivery, making the content hard to follow. | 10% |
Additional Notes:
- Use of Visual Aids: Though not explicitly weighted, the quality of visuals (e.g., slides, charts, graphs) will impact the “Presentation of Findings” and “Professionalism and Delivery” sections.
- Time Management: Presentations that exceed or fall short of the allotted time may lose points in “Professionalism and Delivery.”
Get Solution of this Assessment. Hire Experts to solve this assignment for you Before Deadline.
Are you preparing your PSYC8006 Gender and Sexuality in Social Care assignment at The Cork Institute of Technology? Don’t struggle alone — our Ireland Assignments connects you to expert assignment writers who understand psychology and social care research inside out. From literature reviews to primary data analysis, explore our subject page for tailored support. Get our psychology assignment help Ireland today and get a perfectly written report and presentation on “Sexuality & Spirituality” crafted to impress your lecturers and boost your final grade.
