LW2216 Humanitarianism & the Law Assignment Brief 2026 | UCC Ireland
| University | University College Cork (UCC) |
| Subject | LW2216 Humanitarianism and the Law |
LW2216 Second Written Assignment Brief
Essay / Case Note / Policy Briefing
For the second written assignment, which is worth 70% of the total grade for this module, students have a choice of one of three formats of assignment, namely:
- an essay; or
- a case note of a legal judgment; or
- a policy briefing.
Further details on each of these three formats of assignment are provided below.
1. Essay
The objective of the essay is to provide a critical analysis of an aspect of law covered in this module, drawing on primary legal sources, academic writing, and practitioner research and reports. You can choose from one of the following questions:
i. The definition of a ‘refugee’ set out in the 1951 UN Convention relating to the Status of Refugees does not reflect the protection challenges that climate and disaster displaced persons face today. Critically discuss.
ii. With specific reference to the Bhutanese refugees in Nepal, critically discuss how States, humanitarian agencies and refugee communities can use international and domestic law to prevent and respond to sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) in refugee camp settings.
iii. Are ‘soft law’ sources such as the Sendai Framework on Disaster Risk Reduction a more effective way of influencing State behaviour than binding international law?
iv. “The humanitarian imperative implies a right to receive humanitarian assistance and a right to offer it.” (UNICEF, Humanitarian Principles, 2003). In your view, does a right to humanitarian assistance exist in international law?
2. Case Note
The aim of a legal case note is to summarise and analyse a specific case before a court. In particular, the case note should set out the factual background to the case, the procedural steps taken before and after arrest of the suspect, the judgment (including any dissenting judgments) given by the Court, and your own analysis of the Court’s decision. For this module, you can choose one of the following cases:
- Dražen Erdemović “Pilica Farm” (IT-96-22) – war crime of murder committed in Srebrenica, Bosnia-Herzegovina
- The Prosecutor v Jean–Pierre Bemba Gombo (ICC-01/05-01-08) – crimes against humanity and war crimes in Central African Republic
- The Prosecutor v. Jean–Paul Akayesu (ICTR-96-4) – prosecution for genocide in Rwanda
3. Policy Briefing
The objective of a policy briefing is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the factual and legal situation currently existing in regard to a specific humanitarian crisis. The policy briefing should set out the reasons for the humanitarian crisis, the type of crisis, the legal framework applicable in this situation, and actions taken by the national authorities and/or international community. The policy briefing should not just be descriptive but should also provide your own analysis of the situation. You must choose one of the following countries for this policy briefing:
- Ukraine
- Afghanistan
- Syria
- Yemen
- Palestine
- Myanmar
Assignment Guidelines
DEADLINE and SUBMISSION
The deadline for submission of the assignment is Thursday 16st April 2026, by 5.00pm.
All assignments should be submitted on Canvas by 5.00pm on this date.
➢ Please note: there is no provision for late submission of assignments except where an extension has been obtained in advance. Therefore, assignments submitted after the deadline, without prior approval, will be awarded a grade of zero.
WORD COUNT
➢ The maximum word count for this assignment is 3,000 words.
The maximum word count for this assignment will be applied strictly. A penalty of 5% of the total marks available for this assignment will apply in respect of each 10% or part thereof by which the assignment exceeds the word count.
Example: If the limit is 3,000 words:
- from 3,001 to 3,300 the penalty is 5%.
- from 3,301 to 3,600 the penalty is 10% etc.
This maximum word count excludes footnotes and excludes the bibliography. If there is a dispute about the word count, the onus is on the students to explain the discrepancy.
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY
Please note that plagiarism and collusion are serious offences and so take the time to read the information in the Module Syllabus on pp.8-10.
Note also, as per the UCC Academic Integrity for Examinations and Assessments Policy 20252026 (Sept 2025, para 3.5), forms of Academic Misconduct include but are not limited to, the following …
- Unethical Use of AI – Academic Integrity is breached if students submit the products of GenAI as their own work … without authorisation to use GenAI in fulfilling the task.
Please review carefully the School of Law Policy on Use of AI Tools in Assessed Work 2025/26 – available on Canvas.
➢ You are not authorised to use any form of GenAI in the completion of this assignment.
FORMAT
All assignments should be word processed in 12-point font and be double spaced/ use 1.5-line spacing. This assignment should be submitted online in Word or equivalent format, not as a pdf. The first page of the assignment must state the following information:
Student Number:
Module Code:
Module Title:
Lecturer Name(s):
Title of Assignment: Word Count:
The assignment will not be accepted unless this information is provided.
CITATIONS
As this is a legal assignment, it is strongly recommended that you use the OSCOLA citation method:
- The Oxford University Standard for the Citation of Legal Authorities (OSCOL Guidelines, 4th ed, 2012) can be found at: https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/migrated/oscola_4th_edn_hart_2012qui ckreferenceguide.pdf
- The OSCOLACiting International Law Guidelines can be found at: https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/migrated/oscola_2006_citing_internatio pdf
However, it is acceptable to utilise the Harvard referencing style if you are more familiar with this method.
MARKING GUIDE
Some sample Marking and Assessment Criteria are provided on pp.4-5. This outlines the indicative criteria used in the marking process and provides guidance on criteria that you should address in your coursework. You should refer to this as you plan and write your essay.
Queries / Staff Contact
Please pose questions on the Discussion Forum on Canvas so all members of the class can receive the same information at the same time, unless your query contains specific personal information. Any personal queries should be directed to the Module Convenor, Dr Marie Aronsson-Storrier, at maronsson-storrier@ucc.ie.
Marking & Assessment Criteria
The pass standard for this module is 40%. Marks in passed element(s) of continuous assessment are carried forward. Students failing an assignment(s), which includes failure to submit, must submit another assignment on a topic set for the Autumn Supplemental Examination, as prescribed by the School of Law.
As per other Law modules, the marks bands are as follows:
| 1st Class Honours | 70 – 100% | Pass | 40 – 44% |
| 2nd Class Honours (Grade 1) | 60 – 69% | Fail / Pass by Compensation | 30 – 39% |
| 2nd Class Honours (Grade 2) | 50 – 59% | Fail | <30% |
| 3rd Class Honours | 45 – 49% |
UCC uses the National University of Ireland Grade Descriptors, which are available on the module page on Canvas.
The following key areas will be used in the marking and assessment process, so students should keep these in mind while planning and writing their essay.
| Coherent &
Detailed Knowledge |
–
– |
Identification of key aspects of the module
Ability to draw inter-linkages between theory, caselaw, statutes and practice as appropriate |
| Theoretical
Understanding & Analysis |
–
– – |
Ability to solve problems using module specific ideas and techniques
Ability to describe and comment upon particular aspects of research or scholarship Demonstration of critical thinking |
| – | Ability to deploy subject specific techniques of analysis | |
| Use of Sources | –
– |
Ability to use primary legal sources
Ability to use secondary legal sources including key texts, books, journal articles, and relevant websites |
| Argument | –
– – |
Logical development of ideas
Ability to devise and sustain arguments Ability to express opinions on the basis of theory and empirical evidence |
| – | Effective introduction and conclusion | |
| Communication & Presentation | –
– – – |
Clarity of purpose
Layout of the work Consistent and precise use of references Word count |
| – | Grammar and spelling | |
| – | Adoption of appropriate conventions in writing |
Order Your LW2216 Humanitarianism & the Law Assignment Answer With UCC Guidelines
Many students struggle with the LW2216 Humanitarianism & the Law assignment because they either don’t have enough time or find analysing international humanitarian law, refugee protection issues, and complex legal cases difficult to explain critically. But now there is no need to worry, as Ireland Assignments provides reliable cork assignment help aligned with University College Cork assignment requirements. For trust, you can also check our UCC assignment examples. Hire today law assignment helper to get a 100% custom, human-written LW2216 assignment answer, written only for you.

