MNA1066 /HR5102 Coaching & Mentoring Assignment Brief 2026 | DCU
| University | Dublin City University (DCU) |
| Subject | MNA1066 /HR5102 Coaching & Mentoring |
MNA1066 /HR5102 Assignment Brief
Assignment I — Coaching Logs & Reflective Report
Purpose & Link to Learning Outcomes
This assignment is designed to foster self-knowledge, self-awareness, applied coaching skills, and ethical judgment through structured practice and reflective writing. It primarily evaluates the application of the GROW model, the development of a working alliance, and the capacity for critical reflection on coaching practice. The assignment is mapped to module learning outcomes 2–4 and 7.
Assignment Components
- Coaching Practice Logs (four entries, approximately 250–350 words each): Complete a log after each session, documenting the context, process, ethical considerations, outcomes, and key learning points.
- Reflective Report (approximately 1,000 words): Provide a critical reflection on the overall coaching experience, integrating relevant theory with practice. The report should include an Introduction, a description of events (What happened), analysis (So what), implications for future practice (Now what), and a references section. The So What and Now What should make up the core of the reflective piece, and the description of events What should be kept to a minimum. The reference section is not part of the word count.
Formatting & Referencing
Submit a single document containing the four coaching logs and the reflective report. Use APA style referencing and ensure all coachee details are anonymised.
Use of AI for Assignment
The use of any Generative AI tool (e.g., ChatGPT, Bard, Copilot, DALL-E, Gemini) to generate content for this assignment is strictly prohibited. All work submitted must be your own original thought and expression.
Assignment I Rubric: 20% weighting | Marks available: 100
| Criterion | Far exceeds
expectations
|
Exceeds expectations | Meets expectations | Achieved | Below expectations |
| Clearly articulate your experience of coaching practice and evaluate your developmental experience
25 |
Persuasive illustration and articulation | Fluent illustration and
articulation |
Mainly cogent and clear illustration & articulation | Sufficient clarity provided | Difficult to follow your illustration and lacking clarity |
| Evidence of self-reflection on what you have learnt about yourself, your style, values and principles when engaged in coaching
25 |
Compelling presentation of self-reflection | Clear demonstration with convincing evidence of reflection | Good insights shared around
self-development and use of reflection. Lacked sufficient depth |
Narrative focussed, very little evidence of reflection | No evidence
of self reflection |
| Illustrate your ability to receive feedback and make adaptive changes to your coaching approach
25 |
Compelling presentation of
ability to adapt change |
Clear demonstration with convincing
evidence of ability to adapt |
Good insights with convincing
evidence of ability to adapt to change |
Insufficient insights on
ability to adapt feedback and make change |
No evidence
of interpretation of feedback and approach to change |
| Demonstration of how you considered the ethical dimensions of coaching
relationships 15 |
Identifies and anticipates ethical
dilemmas |
Identifies key ethical points with some
demonstration of understanding |
Knowledge of ethical considerations
shared but without insight of potential impact |
Mentions ethics but at a superficial level | Omits any consideration of ethics |
| Professionalism and use of appropriate sources
10 |
Excellent attention paid to presentation of work and sources used | Clear attention paid to presentation of work and sources used | Clear attention paid to presentation of work and sources used but some errors remain/ additional opportunities for supporting sources | Sufficient attention paid to presentation of work and sources used, although several errors remain | Little or no attention paid to presentation of work |
Submit Your MNA1066 /HR5102 Coaching & Mentoring Assignment with Confidence Today
Assignment II — Individual Paper on a Coaching/Mentoring Topic
Purpose & Link to Learning Outcomes
To critically evaluate a coaching or mentoring topic of personal or professional relevance, integrate current research, and apply relevant concepts to organisational practice or programme design. This assignment is mapped to learning outcomes 1–6.
Assignment Component
For the final assessment, you are asked to prepare a paper (no more than 3,000 words, including references) on a coaching/mentoring topic of interest to you. Topics for consideration might include, but are not limited to:
- Critically evaluate the literature on implementing a coaching or mentoring programme in an organisation.
- The use and effectiveness of internal and external coaches and mentors within an organisation: a critical evaluation.
- Compare, contrast and critically evaluate at least two coaching models in terms of their use in organisations, one of which should be a model covered in this module.
- ‘As many empirical studies, coaching experts and most practitioners stress, the quality of the coaching relationship is the single most determinant of success in coaching’ (Knights, A. (2008) Developing Coaching Capability in Organisations CIPD). Critically evaluate this claim in terms of implementing a coaching or mentoring programme in an organisation.
- Critically evaluate the role and importance of contracting in the coaching and mentoring process in an organisational context.
- A title of your own which you have agreed formally with the module leaders.
You are encouraged to choose a topic that will be of value to you from a personal/professional development perspective.
We propose a structure that includes, Title, Introduction, Critical evaluation of the relevant literature and practice, application to practice (and specifically in the context of your professional role), Conclusion and References.
Your paper will review the relevant published research on the topic and apply concepts or frameworks from the literature to critically evaluate and gain insight into the situation or issue you have chosen. As a guideline you need to make reference to a minimum of six and maximum of 12 sources in this essay. We strongly recommend that you use Journal papers as well as books in order to find the latest research on subjects.
Submit a 3000-word essay on 17 April 2026, 23.59 pm on LOOP Formatting & Referencing
Submit a single document containing the four coaching logs and the reflective report. Use APA style referencing and ensure all coachee details are anonymised.
Use of AI for Assignment II
You are encouraged to experiment with DCU authorised Generative AI tools for [specific learning outcomes, e.g., exploring complex topics, generating different perspectives, creating creative content]. However, you are fully responsible for the accuracy, originality, and ethical implications of any AI-generated content. Critical evaluation and proper citation are essential.
Assignment II Rubric: 80% weighting | Marks available: 100
| Criterion | Far exceeds
expectations
|
Exceeds expectations | Meets expectations | Achieved | Below expectations |
| Clear articulation of the problem and organisational relevance
15 |
Persuasive illustration and articulation, with explicit link to Org. strategy and outcomes | Fluent explanation with strong and a clear line of sight to Org. needs. Minor gaps in nuance | Mainly cogent and clear, organisational relevance not fully evidenced | Sufficient clarity provided to understand the problem, relevance to Org. underdeveloped | Problem unclear or misspecified. Difficult to follow your illustration of Org. relevance |
| Critical Evaluation of relevant theory and practice
25 |
Thoughtful and interpretative synthesis of multiple frameworks, contrasts positions and limitations. Original insight | Sound evaluation using appropriate literature,
compares perspectives, and notes some limitations |
Adequate coverage of relevant theories, practices, limited critique. Descriptive in parts. | Basic evaluation, relies on summaries, little integration across sources. | Very little to no evaluation, no critical stance evident. |
| Demonstration of knowledge and understanding of coaching
skills, principles and qualities 25 |
Compelling presentation of knowledge and understanding. | Clear presentation of knowledge and understanding | Good presentation of knowledge and understanding | Sufficient presentation of knowledge and understanding | No evidence of knowledge and understanding |
| Application to organisational context and potential for impact 25 | Innovative and implementable design that illustrates strong feasibility | Well thought out, clear guidance and consideration of approach | Practical suggestions and outline of design and implications | General outline provided with lack of sufficient depth | Generic, lacking insight
and difficult to follow |
| Professionalism and use of appropriate sources
10 |
Excellent attention paid to presentation of work and sources used | Clear attention paid to presentation of work and sources used | Clear attention paid to presentation of work and sources used but some errors remain/ additional opportunities for supporting sources | Sufficient attention paid to presentation of work and sources used, although several errors remain | Little or no attention paid to presentation of work |
Get Solution of this Assessment. Hire Experts to solve this assignment for you Before Deadline.
Are you also struggling with your MNA1066 / HR5102 Coaching & Mentoring assignment? Many students find it difficult to write coaching logs, apply the GROW model, and do proper self-reflection. If you are facing the same issues, you can take support from Coaching & Mentoring Assignment Help. At Ireland Assignments, we provide expert dublin assignment help based on DCU requirements. You can also check our DCU assignment examples to understand the quality. Order help from assignment experts ireland and get a fully human-written, plagiarism-free solution prepared just for you.
